Miranda v. Arizona Essay

Early in 1963, a 17 age old womanhood was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police force force investigated the case, and in short make up and arrested a poor, and mentally overturned man. The name of this man was Ernesto Miranda. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. On work on 13, 1963, Miranda was arrested based on circumstantial evidence linking him to the kidnapping and the rape. After 2 police officers interrogated him for 2 hours, he signed a exculpation to the rape charge. The form he signed included the following disceptation I do hereby specify that I practise this statement voluntarily and of my own free will, with no threats, coercion, or promises of immunity, and with full knowledge of my legal practiceds, catch any statement I make may be used against me. Miranda was non given a full and effective warning of his rights.He was not told of his right to remain silent and his right to counsel. Miranda was found guilty of kidnaping and rap e and was sentenced to 20-30 years gyves on each count. During the criminal prosecution, Mirandas court-appointed lawyer, Alvin Moore, objected that because of these facts, the exculpation was not truly voluntary and should be excluded.In the end of 1966, The Supreme motor hotel, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Mirandas confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to graduation informs Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The Supreme Court of Arizona detailed the principles governing police interrogation. Arizona ruled that detained criminal suspects, preceding to police questioning, must be assured of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.